UP TO 40% OFF LEED EXAM PREP PRODUCTS! | PASS YOUR EXAM CONFIDENTLY, ON YOUR FIRST TRY!
UP TO 40% OFF LEED EXAM PREP PRODUCTS! | PASS YOUR EXAM CONFIDENTLY, ON YOUR FIRST TRY!
Add description, images, menus and links to your mega menu
A column with no settings can be used as a spacer
Link to your collections, sales and even external links
Add up to five columns
Add description, images, menus and links to your mega menu
A column with no settings can be used as a spacer
Link to your collections, sales and even external links
Add up to five columns
A. Togay Koralturk
Last updated on July 15, 2026
8 min read

Consider the human lung: millions of cells, each alive and functional, none of which can breathe. Breathing is what engineers call an emergent property, something the system does that no part can do alone, and it is the single best metaphor for why green buildings need more than good parts. The integrative process is how LEED gets project teams to design the system and not just the cells, and v5 promoted that idea to the category that now opens every scorecard. This guide covers what the integrative process is, the full structure of the Integrative Process, Planning and Assessments category, its three required assessments and its credits, and what exam candidates need to hold onto.
On this page
The integrative process is the collaborative, whole-systems approach to project design that LEED rewards: all disciplines and stakeholders (owner, architects, engineers, contractors, operators) engage together from the earliest discovery phase, analyzing the building as one connected system and letting the connections drive decisions.
The lung analogy above is doing precise work. Assembling the project owner, key stakeholders, architects, civil engineers, and mechanical and electrical engineers does not create a successful project any more than a pile of cells creates breathing; what creates it is a working system with information flowing through it. That system is what the integrative process builds across LEED: shared goals set before design begins, iterative analysis instead of sequential hand-offs, and a team that discovers cross-discipline synergies (the envelope that shrinks the mechanical system, the landscape that manages stormwater) because everyone is watching the same picture. LEED has always preached this; v5 gave it a category with teeth.
Under v5, the Integrative Process, Planning and Assessments (IP) category opens the BD+C scorecard, per USGBC's fact sheet: three assessments required for every project, plus the Integrative Design Process credit, and for Core and Shell projects, required Tenant Guidelines and a six-point Green Leases credit.
| IP item | New Construction | Core and Shell |
|---|---|---|
| Climate Resilience Assessment (IPp1) | Required | Required |
| Human Impact Assessment (IPp2) | Required | Required |
| Carbon Assessment (IPp3) | Required | Required |
| Tenant Guidelines (IPp4) | — | Required |
| Integrative Design Process (IPc1) | 1 point | 1 point |
| Green Leases (IPc2) | — | 6 points |
Read the totals (1 point for New Construction, 7 for Core and Shell) and the category's character appears: it is not where projects harvest points, it is where they earn the right to. Three of its six items are worth nothing at all, which in LEED's grammar means they are non-negotiable. The category is the scorecard's front door, and the wider v5 redesign placed it first for the same reason the integrative process itself puts discovery first: everything downstream depends on it.
Ready to earn your LEED credential?
Trusted by 200,000+ Learners
Every v5 BD+C project must complete the Climate Resilience Assessment (the site's natural-hazard and climate exposure), the Human Impact Assessment (the project's social context and occupants), and the Carbon Assessment (a 25-year carbon projection across energy, refrigerants, embodied carbon, and transportation) before pursuing points.
The trio is v5's clearest personality change, and each assessment earns its place by feeding the credits behind it: the climate findings flow into resilient site design and resilient spaces, the human-context findings into equity and occupant-experience credits, and the carbon projection into the decarbonization plan that anchors Energy and Atmosphere. They are acts of understanding rather than achievement, which is exactly why USGBC could require them universally: no site is too constrained to know its own hazards, people, and carbon. Our full guide to the three assessments walks each one in depth.
The Integrative Design Process credit rewards teams that practice what the category preaches: carrying collaborative discovery through design, with the disciplines analyzing options together in iterative loops rather than optimizing their scopes in sequence. It is worth 1 point in both New Construction and Core and Shell.
One point looks modest until you notice what earning it produces. A team that genuinely runs the process (a discovery phase with everyone present, often anchored by a design charrette; goals set before geometry; energy and water analysis informing design rather than validating it) tends to collect other credits as side effects, because the synergies the process finds are precisely what the rest of the scorecard pays for. The standards agree on the method: ASHRAE Standard 209, which v5 builds on for its energy-modeling credit, calls for a building-performance-focused design charrette in early design. The credit, in other words, pays 1 point for behavior worth far more, which is LEED nudging at its most transparent.
Core and Shell projects carry two extra IP items: required Tenant Guidelines (IPp4) and the six-point Green Leases credit (IPc2), because a Core and Shell developer hands most of the building's future decisions to tenants, and the category makes that hand-off part of the design.
The logic is the integrative process extended in time. A Core and Shell project delivers a building whose interiors, operations, and daily energy use belong to tenants who have not arrived yet, so the most consequential collaboration is with people not in the room. Tenant Guidelines answer that structurally: the developer documents how tenant build-outs should carry the building's sustainability intent forward. Green Leases go further and put performance into the lease itself, aligning landlord and tenant incentives (who pays for efficiency, who benefits) that conventional leases famously split. Six points make it the category's largest item, a strong signal of how much v5 values locking sustainability into the building's business arrangements, not just its drawings.
The category is the integrative process operationalized: the assessments are discovery's required homework, the charrette is where their findings become shared goals, the iterative design loops carry those goals into geometry and systems, and the credits reward teams that keep the loop running.
Follow one thread to see the machine work. The Carbon Assessment projects the building's 25-year carbon story; that projection lands on the table at the goal-setting charrette; the team's integrative design loops then test massing, envelope, and electrification options against it; and the resulting strategy cascades through the Energy and Atmosphere and Materials and Resources credits where the points actually live. The same thread runs from the climate assessment to resilient design, and from the human-impact assessment to the equity credits. Nothing in the category stands alone, which is fitting for the part of LEED whose entire message is that nothing in a building does either; the rating-system family carries the same integrative logic to every project type.
The integrative process is core content on both exams: the Green Associate exam tests the concept and the category's structure, while the AP BD+C exam tests applying it on projects, and since June 30, 2026, both exams test the v5 version described on this page.
Exam tip: Hold the category as a structure: three required assessments (Climate Resilience, Human Impact, Carbon — the Carbon Assessment is a 25-year projection) plus the Integrative Design Process credit (1 point), with Tenant Guidelines and Green Leases appearing on Core and Shell. Remember that the process begins in discovery, before design, with all disciplines and stakeholders.
Study it the way the category itself argues: as one connected system, not a list. The assessments feed the charrette, the charrette feeds the design loops, the loops feed the credits, and exam questions reward candidates who can walk that chain in either direction. That connected way of learning the rating system is exactly how our Green Associate Complete Exam Prep Pack teaches it, with the course and study guide built as one teaching system, and our flashcards keep the category's names and numbers (the trio, the credit, the points) ready for exam day.
Ready to earn your LEED credential?
Trusted by 200,000+ Learners
The collaborative, whole-systems approach to project design that LEED rewards: all disciplines and stakeholders engage from the discovery phase onward, analyzing the building as one connected system. Under v5 it is formalized as the Integrative Process, Planning and Assessments category that opens the scorecard.
Per USGBC's v5 scorecard: three required assessments (Climate Resilience, Human Impact, and Carbon), the Integrative Design Process credit worth 1 point, and, for Core and Shell projects, required Tenant Guidelines and the six-point Green Leases credit.
The Climate Resilience Assessment (the site's natural-hazard and climate exposure), the Human Impact Assessment (the project's social context and occupants), and the Carbon Assessment (a 25-year carbon projection across energy, refrigerants, embodied carbon, and transportation). All three are prerequisites.
Carrying collaborative discovery through design: goals set with the full team before design begins, and options analyzed in iterative, cross-discipline loops. It is worth 1 point in both New Construction and Core and Shell.
Leases that build sustainability performance into the landlord-tenant relationship, aligning incentives for efficiency and operations. In v5, the Green Leases credit is worth 6 points on Core and Shell projects, the largest item in the IP category.
Because a Core and Shell developer hands the building's future decisions to tenants: the category adds required Tenant Guidelines and the six-point Green Leases credit to extend the integrative process to occupants who have not arrived yet.
Yes, as core content: the concept (early, collaborative, iterative), the category's structure, the three required assessments, and the process vocabulary from charrette to discovery are all fair game on the v5 exam.
Yes, at project depth: the v5 BD+C exam expects you to apply the process, from how the assessments feed design strategy to how the Integrative Design Process credit is earned and documented on a real project.

A. Togay Koralturk May 14, 2026 3 min read
As building professionals prepare for this significant update, two critical questions arise: what are the major changes in LEED v5, and when will the LEED credential exams transition to the new version?

A. Togay Koralturk May 14, 2026 2 min read

A. Togay Koralturk May 14, 2026 2 min read
A. Togay Koralturk is a globally recognized pioneer and educator in sustainable design and construction, as well as an international best-selling author of LEED study guides. His LEED publications have reached tens of thousands of professionals worldwide and have been widely adopted as primary course materials at leading universities across the United States. Holding a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and a master’s degree in construction management from the University of Southern California, he began his career in Los Angeles, CA, earning his LEED AP® credential along the way in 2008. He has helped numerous projects pursue LEED certification worldwide and has educated thousands of professionals.